Visa Denial Federal Court Appeals
Challenging USCIS visa denials through Administrative Procedure Act litigation
When USCIS Denies Your Petition
USCIS denies thousands of visa petitions each year. Many denials are based on errors, misinterpretation of evidence, or improper application of legal standards.
Administrative appeals through AAO can take years and often rubber-stamp initial denials. But you have another option: challenging the denial in federal court.
DC Federal Litigation PLLC litigates visa denial challenges in federal district court, seeking to overturn arbitrary and capricious USCIS decisions.
Exhaustion Requirements
Generally, you must exhaust administrative remedies before filing in federal court. This means:
Filing an administrative appeal (AAO or appropriate forum)
Receiving a final agency decision
Or demonstrating that exhaustion would be futile
When Can You Challenge a Visa Denial in Federal Court?
Exceptions to Exhaustion
Courts may excuse exhaustion when:
Administrative appeal would be futile
Agency position is clearly established
Irreparable harm would result from delay
Legal issue requires no additional factual development
Timing
The statute of limitations for APA challenges is typically six years, but you should act promptly after final denial.
Types of Visa Denials We Challenge
H-1B Petition Denials
H-1B denials are increasingly common. Common grounds include:
Specialty occupation challenges
Wage level disputes
Employer-employee relationship issues
Beneficiary qualifications
We challenge denials based on:
Misapplication of specialty occupation criteria
Improper wage level determinations
Unjustified employer-employee relationship findings
Arbitrary credibility determinations
L-1 Petition Denials
L-1 intracompany transferee petitions face scrutiny on:
Qualifying relationship between entities
Managerial or executive capacity (L-1A)
Specialized knowledge (L-1B)
One year employment abroad
We challenge denials based on:
Improper specialized knowledge standards
Arbitrary managerial capacity findings
Misapplication of qualifying relationship rules
EB-5 Investor Petition Denials
EB-5 denials involve complex issues:
Source of funds documentation
At-risk investment requirement
Job creation requirements
Regional center compliance
We challenge denials based on:
Improper source of funds standards
Arbitrary credibility findings
Misapplication of at-risk requirements
National Interest Waiver Denials
NIW petitions require showing extraordinary ability or advanced degree and national interest. Denials often involve:
National interest determination
Prong analysis under Matter of Dhanasar
Evidence evaluation
We challenge denials based on:
Improper Dhanasar analysis
Arbitrary evidence evaluation
Failure to consider totality of evidence
Other Petition Denials
We also challenge:
O-1 extraordinary ability denials
EB-1 outstanding researcher denials
I-140 employment-based petition denials
I-130 family-based petition denials
Naturalization Denial Lawsuits
Special Rules for Naturalization
Naturalization applications have unique federal court review rights under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b):
120-Day Rule: If USCIS fails to make a determination within 120 days of your examination, you can file in federal district court.
De Novo Review: The court conducts de novo (fresh) review, not just review of the administrative record.
Court Options: The court may:
Determine the naturalization application itself
Remand to USCIS with instructions to decide within 30 days
Common Naturalization Denial Issues
Good moral character challenges
Continuous residence questions
Physical presence calculations
English and civics test issues
Attachment to Constitution
The Legal Standard: Arbitrary and Capricious
APA Review
Federal courts review USCIS decisions under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706). The primary standard is whether the agency action was "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law."
What Makes a Decision Arbitrary and Capricious?
Failed to consider relevant factors
Relied on improper factors
Made clear error of judgment
Failed to articulate rational connection between facts and decision
Applied incorrect legal standard
Failed to consider evidence
Chevron Deference
Courts give deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes, but this deference has limits. USCIS interpretations that are unreasonable or contrary to statutory purpose are not entitled to deference.
The Litigation Process
Filing the Complaint
Your complaint will:
Identify the denial being challenged
Allege violations of the APA
Request declaratory and injunctive relief
Seek remand with instructions
Administrative Record
The case is typically decided on the administrative record—the documents USCIS considered in making its decision. We analyze the record for:
Favorable evidence USCIS ignored
Improper standards applied
Errors in reasoning
Briefing
Parties file cross-motions for summary judgment or motions for judgment on the record. Briefs argue:
Whether USCIS applied correct legal standards
Whether decision was supported by the record
Whether USCIS considered all relevant evidence
Oral Argument
Courts may hold oral argument on the motions.
Decision
If you prevail, the court typically remands to USCIS with instructions. The court may order:
Approval of the petition
Reconsideration under correct standards
Additional fact-finding
Benefits of Federal Court Challenge
Faster Resolution
While AAO appeals can take years, federal court litigation often resolves in months.
Neutral Decision-Maker
Federal judges are independent Article III judges, not USCIS employees.
Different Standards
Courts apply rigorous APA review, not the deferential approach AAO often applies.
Binding Precedent
Court decisions create binding precedent that affects future cases.
Settlement Leverage
Litigation creates pressure for favorable settlement.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Generally yes, unless exhaustion would be futile. We evaluate each case to determine whether exhaustion is required or can be excused.
-
Cases typically resolve within 6-12 months, though complex cases may take longer. This compares favorably to AAO appeals that often take 2+ years.
-
Success depends on the strength of your case and the nature of USCIS's errors. We evaluate likelihood of success during consultation.
-
Courts can order USCIS to approve a petition in appropriate cases, though more commonly they remand with instructions. Upon remand, USCIS often approves rather than repeat the same errors.
-
We discuss fees during consultation. Costs depend on case complexity. Attorney's fees may be recoverable if you substantially prevail.
-
Immigration status during litigation depends on your current status and circumstances. We can discuss this during consultation.
Contact Our Immigration Litigation Team
If your visa petition was wrongly denied, federal court may be the path to approval.
We challenge denials for:
H-1B specialty occupation petitions
L-1 intracompany transferee petitions
EB-5 investor petitions
National Interest Waivers
Naturalization applications
Other immigration petitions
Contact:
Phone: 956-224-9372